What is his deal? And skip the neutral board poster bs. No one's neutral on that board. You have the live-5, and you have the people that have been screwed by PP. There is no middle. Who says, "yeah, I get screwed by PP, but hey, that's ok with me. I like them anyway." ???
He is over there talking s**t about one of the most respected sites on the web. And lying to get his point across. Mike, YOU suck!
LOL That's probably why they let him get away with a bit more.
Look in all fairness. Not all situations are PP's fault.
But the lie 5 tries to SPIN ALL situations into not being PP's fault.
Simple as that. Even on the ppsux.com boards I read stuff all the time that is purely the stupidity of the end users part.
Therefore I don't respond and waste my time.
Same thing on the lie 5 boards too. some of these people are just plain stupid so no need to sit and read all the BS that ensue after the true answer that has been given usually four or five posts in the thread.
The rest is just job security for the shills to show the "man" they are all on top of things. LOL
But when we are talking snatching back funds weeks and months later, or freezing accounts or legal issue. I'm all over it and recording the crap being shoveled by the shills.
He just stuck his foot in his mouth, by asking why on earth would he ever go to those "other" sites. 5 minutes before he stated he was on the "other" site all the time.
Mike, you'd better take that dog outside, before he gets fleas!
mikedn (370 ) View Listings | Report Jul-27-06 14:06 PDT 16 of 168 You must have accidently going to that other board on how paypal sucks.
My antivirus and antispyware lights up like Madison Square Garden whenever I point my browser to there.
Mike, if this is true, please post a screenshot and a logfile. Since you are nuetral, you do believe such info should be availalable to, and would benefit the consumer, right?
__________________
CAPP Consumers Against PayPal Policies - Exposing the sleazery of sleazebay and painpal
Well such a nuetral personality, whom I believe claims to be some sort of law enforcement official, knows well and understands the importance of evidence in support of one's claims.
It would be unfair to aggreived paypal users to let them stumble upon a site loaded with virus and other malware, would it not? Any person who had proof of that and did not share certainly would not be fair or nuetral, but negligent, would they not?.
Now if someone's antivirus and antispyware light up "like Madison Square Garden" whenever they point their browsers to there, it would be very easy to document, would it not?
I for one cannot understand why anyone (especially some one who is a nuetral in ebay/PP matters, and a law enforcement person to boot) would wish to deprive consumers of such information.
__________________
CAPP Consumers Against PayPal Policies - Exposing the sleazery of sleazebay and painpal
Mikie is getting hosed on an auction, so he posted a thread asking, " who's going to pay for this one?" I'm thinking if he reads ANY of the threads over there he knows the answer already!