I thought there was a 'blackout' (not sure what the actual term is) period wherein insiders couldn't trade?
How fortunate the price per share on the 14th was, I believe, $54.77 as opposed to the figure above, or whatever it may have been/may be outside of whatever insider trading 'blackout' period may exist?
Whatever... ? nothing would surprise me.
Would it you?
-- Edited by budnonymous on Wednesday 16th of October 2013 08:04:05 PM
The funny part there is the comment that was deleted in the time it took to load the comments tab. ^
rotflmao
NetSales wrote:
If stock analysts were fully aware of the numbers manipulations and "cooking the books" that reliable sources have indicated that ebay engages in, their heads would be spinning. How far away is an SEC investigation into ebay?
Oct 18, 2013 9:20am EDT
Edit to add:
Now revisiting page about 50 minutes later, the comment re-appeared. lmao! Not sure what to think...
-- Edited by budnonymous on Friday 18th of October 2013 08:44:05 AM
Even Cramer noticed the use of the term decelerating "twice modified by dramatically"and the complete nonsense accompanying the bogus, false, contradictory, and misleading statements.
... how about ebay? here's a company that reported a quarter that got worse, worse to the point where it sa [sic] 'ecommerce is dramatically decelerating and that deceleration happened through the course of the quarter,' end quote. the company used the term four times, twice modified by dramatically. i found myself scratching my head even with all of this make-up and now it's underneath my fingernails. how could there be deceleration when numbers were terrific all quarter? ...