The billionaire Republican gubernatorial nominee contributes an additional $13 million of her own money, bringing her personal stake in her election bid to $104 million.
------------------------
This video on her opponent's youtube channel, JerryBrown2010, came out a few days before ^ this.
The conservative John and Ken literally grilled Meg Whitman in the live interview. After the interview, they described her as being flustered and frustrated, and said that she evaded direct questions and engaged in double talk.
Under heated questioning, Meg Whitman seemed to run for cover by criticizing her former Republican opponent in the primaries, Steve Poizner. According to SFGate, Steve Poizner said that apparently Meg Whitman "...did not get the memo that the primary is over."
Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman has spent $104 million on her California gubernatorial bid but trails Jerry Brown by three points. Will she be the next wealthy politician to fail at the polls?
..."Shes outspending Brown 86 to 1 and its still neck and neck," says Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political scientist at the University of Southern California. A July Public Policy Institute Poll puts Mr. Brown three points ahead of Ms. Whitman....
The governor's race, to a considerable extent, is a race to see who does better at their respective campaign task: Meg Whitman at running a $100 million-plus organization or Jerry Brown at running a lean, frugal operation. The winner's skills will then be put to the test in Sacramento.
The vastness of Whitman's operation has naturally attracted more attention in terms of organization - Brown's campaign has even posted a huge organizational chart showing who's getting paid by the campaign and how much, based on the "Expenditures" pages of Whitman's campaign disclosures.
For instance, Mike Murphys Bonaparte Productions, has gotten $861,474; adviser Henry Gomez, $769,216; campaign manager Jilian Hasner, $667,552; adviser Jeff Randle, $572,949;. Each one of those payments is more than the Brown campaign's total expenditures of $519,000 through June 30.
"No one in a governors office ever made this kind of money," Calbuzz writes in this item. "No governors office were aware of ever had such a massive org chart, unless you count all the agencies and departments that are part of an administration and the CHP protective detail."
Former OC Weekly reporter Anthony Pignataro, writing for Cal Watchdog in a piece that was satisfactorily unflattering of Whitman for Brown's campaign to post on its Meg-a-Myths site, compared the operation to the "Pentagon or possibly even the NORAD command bunker" in terms of its secretness and impenetrability.
Elections handicapper Allan Hoffenblum told the Los Angeles Times that Whitman was "doing stuff that is on the level of what an incumbent president would be doing running for reelection." That's from this story looking inside Whitman's campaign and what it's doing.
In a softball interview with Fox News sycophant host Neil Cavuto last May, Meg Whitman explained what it is about the sorry state of things that made her decide that she must "refuse to let California fail."
Said eMeg: "The first thing we have to do is, we have to streamline government." And to make it easier for business to grow? "Well, the first thing you do is, we have got to streamline regulation.
"The permitting process, the competing agencies that try to regulate - we built a building in Sunnyvale for PayPal, two-and-a-half years to break ground. We had to hire three consultants to navigate the labyrinth of California regulations."
Powerful testimony to the debilitating roadblocks plucky little eBay faced as it sought to build a new home for PayPal. It's a story Whitman has repeated often - portraying it as one of the principal experiences that compelled her to get into politics.
There's only one problem. It's what Harry G. Frankfurt, professor emeritus of philosophy at Princeton, eMeg's alma mater, calls 'bulls#it.'
Second, trying to use a years old clip of President Clinton to slam her opponent, but a clip and statement made, based upon a mistake by the original reporter, which were known and aknowldged, even by the original reporter, to be false on no uncertain terms. Basically President Clinton was repeating false/oncorrect information when he made the statements long ago.
A day after California Attorney General and Democratic candidate for governor Jerry Brown apologized to former President Bill Clinton for a joke about the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Clinton Tuesday not only accepted the apology, he endorsed Brown for governor.
Clinton issued a statement Tuesday saying Brown would be: "An excellent governor at a time when California needs his creativity and fiscal prudence."
Brown apologized Monday for taking a jab at Clinton about the Lewinsky scandal in response to a campaign ad released by Brown's opponent in the gubernatorial race, Republican Meg Whitman.
The ad shows Clinton criticizing Brown when the two were running against each other for president in 1992.
...
ZOMG!!!
Ouch! I think that's ^ gonna leave a mark...
I don't think Meggy is getting her money's worth, and just think, there may be some deep dark dirt on her yet to become known, or she could even have some sort of monster - meltdown or whatever...
Former President Bill Clinton endorsed Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown on Tuesday, just two days after Brown mocked Clinton and less than 24 hours after Brown apologized for those remarks.
Brown also released two TV ads accusing Republican rival Meg Whitman of lying, while the Whitman campaign threatened legal action against TV stations for running what it said was a "slanderous" anti-Whitman ad by the California Teachers Association.
Clinton made his endorsement in a statement to the Los Angeles Times on Tuesday, saying, "I strongly support Jerry Brown for governor because I believe he was a fine mayor of Oakland, he's been a very good attorney general, and he would be an excellent governor at a time when California needs his creativity and fiscal prudence."
The former president also brushed off suggestions that he was holding a grudge against Brown, with whom he fought a bruising presidential primary battle in 1992.
"Moreover, the tough campaign we fought 18 years ago is not relevant to the choice facing Californians today," Clinton said. "Jerry and I put that behind us a long time ago."
On Sunday, Brown dinged Clinton while responding to a Whitman TV ad featuring a 1992 clip of Clinton criticizing Brown.
"I mean Clinton's a nice guy, but whoever said he always told the truth?" Brown said in a speech in Los Angeles.
On Tuesday, Brown said he was "deeply honored" by the endorsement from Clinton, who "after his accomplishment-rich presidency, continues to demonstrate his commitment to bettering our state, our nation, and our world, each and every day."
Brown campaign manager Steve Glazer said further assistance from Clinton, as well as other big-name Democrats such as President Barack Obama, is in the works.
Whitman spokeswoman Andrea Jones Rivera said the Clinton endorsement was no surprise.
Jones Rivera also said Whitman would continue running the ad featuring Clinton, although former CNN reporter Brooks Jackson wrote over the weekend that his 1992 report about Brown's record, which Clinton cites in the clip, had bungled some key facts.
"The fact remains that President Clinton's criticism was correct," Jones Rivera said.
Brown himself cited the Clinton ad to depict Whitman as a liar in the newly unveiled ads, which show Whitman's nose growing like Pinocchio's.
At a press conference in Sacramento, Glazer warned, "We're going to fight back" against what he said was Whitman's "shameful pack of lies."
Later Tuesday, it was Whitman's turn to call for truthfulness in campaigning in letters to TV stations threatening to sue them for slander if they ran a new ad by the California Teachers Association.
The spot accuses Whitman of proposing a $7 billion cut from school budgets and 100,000 teacher layoffs.
"CTA is free to criticize Meg's position on education or any other topic, however, it may not concoct false positions and ascribe them to her," reads the letter from Whitman campaign attorney Thomas Hiltachk.
Comcast spokesman Andrew Johnson said the cable company opted to stop running the ad after receiving the letter. Comcast serves 2 million households from Salinas to Mendocino County.
"We received documentation from attorneys representing both sides," Johnson said. "We reviewed the documentation and after review, our legal team determined the allegations made in the ad could not be substantiated and we pulled the ad."
CTA spokeswoman Sandra Jackson said the ad's claim was based on Whitman's plan to cut $15 billion in state funding overall. She said K-12 and higher education spending make up about half of the state's general fund and typically suffer about half the cuts in difficult budget years.
Hiltachk said in his letter that such a formula is "nonsense" and that education spending is not one of the areas identified by Whitman for cuts.
There's been so much Meg Fail it's hard to keep up... Wow! I think a lot more people are beginning to see the lady is nothing short of a full-blown lunatic and a pathological liar!
^ Meggy gets called out, punked out and owned by a girl with legit questions, spins major yarn, STILL refuses to pull an ad which is universally recognized as false!
About the only chance Meggy has now is to cheat... and there is every reason to believe that she will try to cheat... She has literally million$ upon million$ of reasons to.
In choosing between Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown, voters will need to decide which candidate has the best combination of policies, life experiences and ...
"While much of Meg Whitman's record is still unknown, what we do know is cause for ... "According to numerous news accounts, Meg Whitman committed an act of ...
SACRAMENTO, CA - Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman are neck and neck in the race for governor, but their campaign spending is about as far apart as two candidates ...
But if anyone hasn't been paying attention, she's already laid the groundwork of cheating, so don't be surprised if this is not over after today.
I'll have to say I'm a little disappointed that her opponent got all the credit for calling her a whore, a Nazi, and a liar. So many have done that in the past it's not funny. (as we all know well, 2 of those terms are empirically correct, the third is arguable at least)
So... Monster Meg gets the 140 million dollar slapdown put on her ectothermic self! Bwhahaa! Too funny! She's also still getting quite a roasting across the web I see.
If only Meggy would have donated that money to California's budget from jumpstreeet she may have had a chance?
Men grow tired of sleep, love, singing, and dancing sooner than war.
-- Edited by budnonymous on Thursday 4th of November 2010 06:58:30 PM