U.S. retailers and police called on Congress on Thursday to require online auction sites such as eBay to post the serial numbers of items for sale to help crack down on gangs of professional shoplifters.
The Internet auction sites should also provide more information about high-volume sellers of goods, they said.
Both Democrats and Republicans on a House of Representatives Judiciary subcommittee said the issue is ripe for legislative attention, noting the retail industry loses more than $30 billion a year from organized theft.
"The size and complexity of this topic shows a need for assistance from the federal government," said Rep. Bobby Scott, chairman of the subcommittee and a Democrat from Virginia.
The lawmakers did not say if legislation would move swiftly in coming weeks on the topic of organized retail crime.
Retailers testifying at the hearing said lawmakers should focus more on preventing organized retail crime rather than cracking down on offenders, which they said is difficult because of limited police resources.
Organized retail theft happens when groups of shoplifters steal vast quantities of goods and typically resell them on Web sites or at flea markets, pawnshops or other stores.
Retailers say gangs of thieves posing as shoppers use diversionary tactics with store clerks, emergency exit doors and foil-lined bags to defeat electronic merchandise tags.
Internet sites have been criticized for helping aid retail thieves by allowing sellers to remain relatively anonymous.
"We need to take a new approach," said Brad Brekke, vice president for assets protection at Target.
"Internet auction sites could make simple changes, making high-volume sellers identify themselves and provide unique product identities."
Robert Chesnut, senior vice president of rules, trust and safety at eBay, said it was reasonable "to think about what we could do about high-volume sellers." But he said sellers are generally nervous about posting their names, addresses and telephone numbers on product listings.
"We're not opposed where it makes sense," he added.
Chesnut said additional disclosure makes more sense in areas such as auto sales and noted that eBay currently requires sellers to provide vehicle identification numbers to cut down on the sale of stolen vehicles on the site.
But requiring sellers to post serial numbers would not be an effective deterrent because they could simply make up numbers, he said.
Chesnut said eBay gets about 1,000 inquiries each year from police about investigations related to stolen goods.
"I believe that number would increase a whole lot if the description of items being posted on the Internet were more detailed and included serial numbers," said David Hill, a detective with the Montgomery County, Maryland Police Department.
Retailers said a critical issue is that Internet auction sites are required to provide seller information only to law enforcement, not to retailers' own investigators.
"Operators of sites such as eBay have historically failed to provide any meaningful information to retail investigators," said Karl Langhorst, director of loss prevention for Randall's and Tom Thumb stores, a division of Safeway.
"Without this cooperation, we are severely hampered in securing the evidence needed by federal investigators to even open an investigation."
The disclosure of more seller information would help deter
retail crime by diminishing the anonymity of thieves, Langhorst said.
"We're focused on loss prevention rather than loss reaction," he added.
Posted by Paul Glazowski on October 26th, 2007 The online auction powerhouse eBay has lately come under increased pressure to sort out fraud- and theft-related nonsense occurring on its site. US retailers, as well as state authorities, recently called on Congress to require eBay, among other auction portals on the Web, to make mandatory the posting of product serial numbers in order to better help target those conducting the criminal activity.
Yesterday, Reuters released a report stating that a bipartisan consensus on a House Judiciary subcommittee has already show strong backing for "legislative action," pointing to the estimated $30 billion figure as far as losses go each year from organized theft.
$30 billion is quite a whopper, for sure, especially when one considers that that loss is calculated annually. (Of course, it's likely less the farther one tracks back in time, and will presumably grow if the activity persists at the current trajectory.) I wonder how much of that hit consists of pilfered Zunes and Motorola phones. You know, 'cause not too many are being sold "over the counter".
In all seriousness, this illegal activity is very significant, and it should stop. When one thinks of the number of consumers who've done business with the perpetrators of such fraudulence (pretty big, for sure) one can rightly sense that a whole host of problems could in fact arise as a result, not the least of which could take shape as denial of customer service and tech support requests. On a grand scale, the long-term continuance of illicit sales could get a whole lot of people in a tizzy - end users and corporate entities alike.
So clearly the industry-wide stipulation for extra measures to be taken by eBay and it's global competitors to ensure authenticity is logically sensible. Yes, on the whole, sellers with wares garnered legitimately will likely be slightly more inconvenienced as a result of the passing of such legislature. But the benefits of such a bill would be far-reaching all the same.
Besides, $30 billion is quite a big write-off. To expect the retailers to tolerate such losses is simply to fail to understand the purpose of industry. There's certainly quite a bit of gray area when it comes to what's okay and whats not okay in your mind, as well as mine. But business is black-and-white.