what color's the nail polish?

How about Orange Crab Capes...I mean...Cakes.....can they join?


I bought some in Clinical Crimson Cunnt, however its not very good quality.  Quite flaky and cheap.  It says its tested on animals......I never knew she tested stuff on herself!!  I wanted a refund but PayPal needed the interest on my money worse.

-- Edited by Nappers_Corner at 00:32, 2007-03-13

IceBlueEyes wrote:

---

Welcome to Capp .  Here's to you.  
We used to have a bar and grill for off topic stuff, but all my friends are in rehab.   We may have to reopen it for girl talk and stuff. . What color nail polish are you wearing?  I was going to go for a pale pink, but it's a little early yet, so i opted for Harlot Red.  We could make it a Girl's Club House and the boys would all try to sneak in to see if we're talking about them.  They are so very VAIN!     It's nice to have another girl around.  The boys are so bad.  They post pictures of Meg, and sniffing dogs, and dress up like pirates, and .   And I love every one of them.  Welcome to the club

<- this is what I really look like, only blue.

---

 

Too darn cute, your welcome thread. Well dear, I am wearing hot pink nail polish, bronze shoes and a bronze hat today because it's cloudy out.

Real secret stuff. lol


Cheers~~

P. S. I just used the edit feature, just because I can. (Inside, attorney's joke!).


-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 09:46, 2007-03-13

WorkingStiff wrote:

---

Chat board addict Cyber Diva was banned from Ebay for being a notorious libeler and auction interferer. Cyber Diva's specialities are using socks to post personal information, filing false police reports, and libel, libel, libel

The feds are on to Loopy's criminal ways.

---

WorkingStiff is right. The admin here has already removed a link to Diva's stalking site. But admin is allowing the owner of the notorious site to continue posting here??

Not very smart, imo.

-- Edited by frostedflake at 10:10, 2007-03-13

lInk please? Proof please (to the two trollers of misinformation, that is!).


For the correct history.... let me please add this here:

IceBlueEyes wrote:

---

We get little visits  from Lieworld employees.( how to recogonize a lieworld employee -> ) On the PP board, they insist they never come here, so they can't really respond to some of the things posted here.  It makes them .       They do this -> 
It is an honor to be so well thought of in the e-bay community, that they have us on watch and send their people here to dispute, not the truth, but the authors of the truth.
But poor Xe.  To him they must be like these little mice constantly nipping at his ankles.  I don't know how he stands it.  

---

 

Good points. I find this especially of interest,

they have us on watch and send their people here to dispute, not the truth, but the authors of the truth.

There are a few "off eBaY boards" as well, which are devoted to doing the same thing....."discredit the authors of the truth."

I can name a few boards, as examples, when the time comes, or in private. The list goes on an on, and the "study" is in its development stage, as well.


Those boards, however, are noted for providing misinformation about certain individuals, repeatedly (and targeted companies, in some cases.).

The owners of some of these off eBay sites (rumor-mills, etc.) have been involved in what they refer to as their "board wars" for nearly a decade now. Some have even written to eBay's pink "Ms. Kelley" about their board wars, that's how seriously they take their own war.

Just thought I would share that bit of info for in the Future, and add..... may the best BOARD "win". *lol*


Signed by,

Cyber Diva



[edit note: typo]

badass wrote:

---

Diva, remember me, b.itch? I will if you do. GOT IT? Good.

---

 

Your picture looks familiar, sweetie. So, I guess I remember you. **lol**




[file note: At one time this particular user "badass" appeared to have been a spoofed account. evidently the rightful owner took it over. Could be. **smile**]

Cyber Diva wrote:

---

virusesrus wrote:

---

That's because this board is not moderated. Even though they say it has a moderator, they don't actually DO anything ( too scared as people might start crying and comparing the board to the Liveworld Paypal Board ).

I also remember Cyber Diva from the boards - a real nasty piece of work that no one should get involved with.

---

 

Virusesrus hon, you are again confusing me with an imposter. The board poster going by the name "cyber*diva" is not me. The poster who impersonated me also filed false police reports after being instructed to do so by her "gang" of stalkers from the following board:

The Steel Dragon



Thank you for your keen insight though. **roll eyes**




edit note: typo




-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 10:47, 2007-03-13

---

Youre a fu.ckin liar diva. Watch yourself.

 

Cyber Diva wrote:

---

frostedflake wrote:

---

---

 Diva Said:

You are incorrect, once again. There was no link removed, and there is no "stalking" website, as you must know by now, it is an anti/stalking web site designed to exposed the lot of evil-doers in the world. Sort of like "smoking them out of their caves," for in the Future no LIBELOUS pack of wolves will be able to terrorize people "anonymously" anymore. Got that?

-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 11:04, 2007-03-13

---

Not true.

BellisimaJ. said: "Speaking of credibility, another of your posters, lieworld, today published links here to 2 notorious stalking sites. The owners of both sites have police records. One of the sites is also a neo-nazi site. Both sites contain reams of PI for people with whom they have disagreed.Linking to those sites is a legal and ethical hazard for you and for this forum." Admin said: "These posts will be removed immediately.  Thank you for alerting me.  If I do not catch them all, please let me know."

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10544344

Your site contains the PI of all your stalking victims. You know, the ones you were narued from ebay for, diva?

STFU, LIAR!!

And to think I waited around to reply to this garbage? Gosh, Diva, can't you even try to sound truthful?

Bye, loopy.

frostedflake wrote:

---

Cyber Diva wrote:

---

frostedflake wrote:

---

---

 Diva Said:

You are incorrect, once again. There was no link removed, and there is no "stalking" website, as you must know by now, it is an anti/stalking web site designed to exposed the lot of evil-doers in the world. Sort of like "smoking them out of their caves," for in the Future no LIBELOUS pack of wolves will be able to terrorize people "anonymously" anymore. Got that?

-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 11:04, 2007-03-13

---

Not true.

BellisimaJ. said: "Speaking of credibility, another of your posters, lieworld, today published links here to 2 notorious stalking sites. The owners of both sites have police records. One of the sites is also a neo-nazi site. Both sites contain reams of PI for people with whom they have disagreed.Linking to those sites is a legal and ethical hazard for you and for this forum." Admin said: "These posts will be removed immediately.  Thank you for alerting me.  If I do not catch them all, please let me know."

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10544344

Your site contains the PI of all your stalking victims. You know, the ones you were narued from ebay for, diva? [NOT correct, your "insider" intelligence is seriously outdated, and flawed.]

STFU, LIAR!!

---

 

More info for fairshare (frostedflake), et al:

As you can see, the one post where networks talking .org was referenced here in this particular forum (CAPP ) was NOT taken down by the admins of this board.

Please review the following:


http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10683610

Cyber Diva wrote [On March 12, 2007]:

---

http://www.networkstalking.org/wordpress/

Does eBay's Adamant Refusal to Police its Sites to Protect Intellectual Property Rights Owners Threaten National Security?

March 11th, 2007

A plain reading of the FBI's mandate concerning cybercrime suggests that eBay's destructive business model may indeed pose a threat to National Security.

www.fbi.gov

http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm[/url]


"The FBI's cyber mission is four-fold: first and foremost, to stop those behind the most serious computer intrusions and the spread of malicious code; second, to identify and thwart online sexual predators who use the Internet to meet and exploit children and to produce, share, or possess child pornography; third, to counteract operations that target U.S. intellectual property, endangering our national security and competitiveness; and fourth, to dismantle national and transnational organized criminal enterprises engaging in Internet fraud."

---

 

[file note: edited to add the link to the other forum thread, for clarification and background info. purposes:

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10683610]

frostedflake wrote:

---

WorkingStiff [An impersonator account of a Ross Show poster] wrote:

---

[removed libel & spam from workingStiff's post ]

-- Edited by WorkingStiff at 10:10, 2007-03-13

---

 Diva and her.... [removed libel & spam from frostedflake's post ]And again. And again.

---

 

And..for the follower "frostedflake" poster......

"frostedflake" [the latest libeler - and deliverer of false info.] wrote:

---

Cyber Diva wrote:

---

frostedflake wrote:

---

---

 Diva Said:

You are incorrect, once again. There was no link removed, and there is no "stalking" website, as you must know by now, it is an anti/stalking web site designed to exposed the lot of evil-doers in the world. Sort of like "smoking them out of their caves," for in the Future no LIBELOUS pack of wolves will be able to terrorize people "anonymously" anymore. Got that?

-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 11:04, 2007-03-13

---

Not true.

BellisimaJ. said: "Speaking of credibility, another of your posters, lieworld, today published links here to 2 notorious stalking sites. The owners of both sites have police records. One of the sites is also a neo-nazi site. Both sites contain reams of PI for people with whom they have disagreed.Linking to those sites is a legal and ethical hazard for you and for this forum." Admin said: "These posts will be removed immediately.  Thank you for alerting me.  If I do not catch them all, please let me know."

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10544344

Your site contains the PI of all your stalking victims. You know, the ones you were narued from ebay for, diva? [NOT correct, your "insider" intelligence is seriously outdated, and flawed.]

STFU, LIAR!!

---

 

More info for fairshare (frostedflake), et al:

As you can see, the one post where networks talking .org was referenced here in this particular forum (CAPP) was NOT taken down by the admins of this board.

Please review the following:


http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10683610

Cyber Diva wrote [On March 12, 2007]:

---

http://www.networkstalking.org/wordpress/

Does eBay's Adamant Refusal to Police its Sites to Protect Intellectual Property Rights Owners Threaten National Security?

March 11th, 2007

A plain reading of the FBI's mandate concerning cybercrime suggests that eBay's destructive business model may indeed pose a threat to National Security.

www.fbi.gov

http://www.fbi.gov/cyberinvest/cyberhome.htm[/url]


"The FBI's cyber mission is four-fold: first and foremost, to stop those behind the most serious computer intrusions and the spread of malicious code; second, to identify and thwart online sexual predators who use the Internet to meet and exploit children and to produce, share, or possess child pornography; third, to counteract operations that target U.S. intellectual property, endangering our national security and competitiveness; and fourth, to dismantle national and transnational organized criminal enterprises engaging in Internet fraud."

---

 

[file note: edited to add the link to the other forum[s] thread, for clarification and background info. purposes:

http://www.activeboard.com/forum.spark?forumID=78886&p=3&topicID=10683610]



Additional file footnote from "networks talking .org" See:

Reforming Online Predators' Behavior is a Public Service
March 13th, 2007

Editor's Note: What is being deceptively described as "contact information" on this site in fact pertains to minimally identifying data necessary only to link certain anonymous online predators with their real world identities, as an aid to their many victims and to law enforcement. In each case, the information in question has been lawfully obtained either from Google search results or directly from the predators themselves, and therefore, it is at best ironic that the same group of predators, which has established these very criteria as sufficient justification for its own publication at various stalking and libel sites of far more invasive information concerning innocent victims, sees neither hypocrisy nor logical contradiction in imposing a double-standard upon everyone else. Nonetheless, any online predator with an issue may address any concerns regarding this anti-stalking site to the webmaster at admin at devala dotcom.

Since January 2006, it has been a violation of Federal law to anonymously libel persons online; therefore, connecting various e-hooligans' true names with their anonymously published venom factually serves Public Policy, and such public service indirectly may benefit the predators themselves too, by stripping them of intoxicating anonymity, a kind of "fire water" these unstable persons cannot seem to manage without becoming a danger both to themselves and to others. Indeed, e-hooligans use anonymity as a strategic tool in their incessant online intrigue, as a protective cloak to conceal motives and agendas, and especially as a shield to insulate predators from the natural consequences of their malicious and often illegal acts. Therefore, depriving the online predator of his or her anonymity is equivalent to removing the cover of night from the cat burglar, or of revealing the true identity of the phisher, and in many instances, such beneficial, prophylactic measures have resulted in helping the predator to overcome the self-destructive addiction to aggression. Once on the path to reform, the former predator may even seek legitimate employment, and thereby complete the transformation from addict, parasite, and hoodlum to at last become a contributing member of society, a result which, short of prosecution, fine, and imprisonment, might otherwise be impossible.

source: http://www.networkstalking.org/wordpress/



-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 23:46, 2007-03-13

Passion dear, do you even know the meaning of the word libel?

For someone who's the niece of Senator Levin: you don't seem to know much about the words you carelessly use.

Here, today's assignment: Study:



Top Web Results for "libel"

10 results for: libel
[ Nearby Entries ]
View results from: Dictionary | Thesaurus | Encyclopedia | All Reference | the Web

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
li·bel [lahy-buhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, -beled, -bel·ing or (especially British) -belled, -bel·ling.
–noun
1. Law.
a. defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
b. the act or crime of publishing it.
c. a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2. anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.
–verb (used with object)
3. to publish a libel against.
4. to misrepresent damagingly.
5. to institute suit against by a libel, as in an admiralty court.
[Origin: 1250–1300; ME: little book, formal document, esp. plaintiff's statement Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.





[file edit note: added an emoticon for Passion's entertainment]



-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 12:16, 2007-03-14

BellisimaJ wrote:

---

"a. defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures."

Thank you, Lorraine. I do believe that your definition covers it nicely. Now that you understand (you did look up defamation, did you not?), I feel sure that you will stop putting yourself in such a precarious position.

BellisimaJ.

---

 

Link please? Proof please?


Senator Levin just called... I gotta take this call.

Be right back, Nicole, darling...........


[file edit note: added an emoticon for Passion's entertainment]


-- Edited by Cyber Diva at 12:22, 2007-03-14

badass wrote:

---

rofl, loopy, you are looking for trouble today arent ya?

I want nothing to do with this......[edited goofy, nutty commentary].

---

 

Oh I know mr. "badass" you've been real beesie at The Ross Show, having a "show-down" with Ms. Passion. Noble work, I'm sure. Did you take over the board yet, like you usually do? Remember PCFree? How can any of us forget!

Oh well!

Here's the real "heavymetal" in action.....@ The Ross Show (get out your futuristic armor! lol):